| First Annual Report on the State of Tolerance (1/1/2008-30/6/2008) |
|
Introduction It seems that the need to disseminate and consolidate the culture and values of tolerance in the Palestinian society has become now, more than ever before, a necessity and an urgent task. Moreover, transforming this culture and values into a societal conduct is not less important. Dealing with this culture as an abstract intellectual concept detached from the actual human behavior is not beneficial. Behavior patterns preceding, accompanying and following the series of conflicts between the Fateh and Hamas movements, the last few years, have proved the need to take rapid steps to spread and plant a culture of tolerance in the Palestinian society. The conflict, in addition to the absence of judiciary and security roles of the Palestinian Authority in the wake of Operation Defensive Shield, carried out by Israeli occupation forces against the infrastructure of the Palestinian Authority, has led to a decline in the levels of tolerance among the Palestinians. This does not imply that the Palestinian society was tolerant at all times, it does not mean that it was not in need of such culture and values, but that the intensity of the conflict, and the tragedies that have accompanied it have made it a more urgent matter than before. The importance of exhibiting tolerant behavior assumes more prominence after tragic events suffered by nations and peoples; absence of tolerance allows for absence of restrictions on conflicting parties, makes them deploy inhuman acts and extreme use of violence without any ethical or legal restrictions. This is what happened when the conflict intensified between Fateh and Hamas in Gaza Strip, and during the retaliatory actions in the West Bank in the wake of the decisive military victory by Hamas. There were executions of fighters captured by their opponents committed in the streets; some were kidnapped and executed, political opponents were shot dead and, in some cases, shooting aimed at causing damage or disability to opponents. If the two parties to the conflict had shown a certain level of tolerance, these acts would not have been committed. |